PHIL AND SOPH: DIALOGUES ABOUT ETERNAL AND PERISHABLE. ON THE 200TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE BIRTH OF KARL MARX: MARXISM,STATE IDEOLOGY AND ‘RUSSIAN SOCIALISM’
Main Article Content
The theoretical legacy of Karl Marx today raises increased interest throughout the world. In Russia, this interest is connected not only with economic issues, but mainly with a preferred political ideology. In series of our papers, we discuss the most acute socio-philosophical issues in the dialogic polemical form. In particularly, the subject matter of this paper is the relevance of socialist doctrines, and to clarify this, we use a conceptual, source, socio-philosophical and historical-philosophical analysis. Thus, we suppose that transformation of the political ideology into theomachic one was largely due to misinterpretation of idea of the Kingdom of God (that it, and, more importantly, society of justice embodies it, is only outside of history and has no relation to this life, which is solely the king suffering). Even the humanists of the Renaissance argued against these and other dogmatic extremes. However, the Church was so dogmatized that it could not adequately respond to challenges of the epoch. Therefore, social thought, and behind it, social consciousness evolved from transcendentism to pantheism and then to materialism and atheism. This new ideology as a promising one was adopted by not only revolutionaries, but also adventurers-fraudsters. At the same time, secularized ideologies are not the only ones: in Latin America an example of such religious social ideology is liberation theology, in Russia it is ‘Russian socialism’ in the spirit of Dostoevsky, Fedotov, Berdyaev, Frank, Stepun. In our article, we give a brief overview of the works of Russian philosophers on this social phenomenon. However, Marxism as an idea is not discredited itself, discredited itself is only social and political practice of its implementation. Meanwhile, it has already undergone significant changes, and now we should talk about its creative application based on the needs of today and the return of the ethical (and religious) component. Marxism does not necessarily have to lead to totalitarianism, unlike capitalism, which has already led to the construction of a totalitarian society, including the modern Western, judging by the information war, in which lies and pandering violence became the norm. This society turned out to be indistinguishable from the dictatorship of the proletariat, since there is always the dictatorship of someone or something in society: capital, capitalists, oligarchs, etc. And the dictatorship of the democratic majority can be much worse than the dictatorship of a single tyrant. The basis of Marxism, on the contrary, is the idea of human emancipation. Thar’s why we conclude that Marxism not only does not contradict the basic ideas of ‘Russian socialism’, but their synthesis can become the basis for the formation of a new productive ideology for the Russian state.
- Bell D. Liberation Theology After the End of History: The Refusal To Cease Suffering. London and New York: Routledge, 2006.
- Berdyaev N.A. The Origins and Meaning of Russian Communism. Moscow: Nauka Publisher, 1990. (In Russian).
- Berdyaev N.A. The Spiritual Foundations of Russian Revolution. Moscow: AST Publisher, 2006. (In Russian).
- Brown R.M. Gustavo Gutiérrez: An Introduction to Liberation Theology. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2013.
- Bulgakov S.N. "Orthodoxy and Socialism." Sociological Studies 3 (1990): 110–111. (In Russian).
- Burdah K. Reformation. Renaissance. Humanism. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publisher, 2004. (In Russian).
- Fedotov G. "Foundations of Christian Democracy." Collected Writings. Moscow: Sam & Sam Publisher, 2004, volume 5. 238–249. (In Russian).
- Fromm E. Escape from Freedom. Moscow: Progress Publisher, 1990. (In Russian).
- Fuchs C., Mosco V. Marx in the Age of Digital Capitalism. Leiden: Brill, 2015.
- Gregor A.J. Totalitarianism and Political Religion: An Intellectual History. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012.
- Grigorenko D.E. "Russian Socialism as an Anti-entropic Concept of Russian Society Administrating." Theory and History 2 (2007): 31–39. (In Russian).
- Hunt E.K. Property and Prophets: The Evolution of Economic Institutions and Ideologies. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2008.
- Kamenka E. The Ethical Foundations of Marxism (RLE Marxism). London: Routledge, 2015.
- Koloğlugil S. "Digitizing Karl Marx: The New Political Economy of General Intellect and Immaterial Labor." Rethinking Marxism1 (2015): 123–137.
- Locke J. "Two Treatises of Government." Writings. Moscow: Mysl Publisher, 1988, volume 3. 135–405. (In Russian).
- Mamardashvili M. K. The Experience of Physical Metaphysics. (Vilnius Lectures on Social Philosophy). Мoscow: Progress-Traditisiya Publisher, 2008. (In Russian).
- Marx K., Engels F. Selected Works. Moscow: Politizdat Publisher, 1983, volume 1. (In Russian).
- McLellan D. Marxism after Marx. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
- Melikov I.M. "Philosophy of Classical Marxism and Russian Socialism." Scientific Notes of the Russian State Social University 3 (2009): 151–158.
- Mill J.S. "On Liberty." Anthology of World Liberal Thought (1st Half of the 20th c.). Eds. M.A. Abramov and M.M. Fedorova. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publisher, 2000. 288–392. (In Russian).
- Pantin I.K. "Socialist Idea: Herzen versus Marx." Voprosy Filosofii 12 (2010): 69–75. (In Russian).
- Parekh B. Marx's Theory of Ideology (RLE Marxism). New York: Routledge, 2015.
- "Paul Tillich’s Methodology." Dictionaries and Encyclopedias on Academic.Ru. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/1805442>. (In Russian).
- Podberezkin A.I. National Human Capital, Volume 3: The Ideology of Russian Socialism. Moscow: Moscow State Institute of International Affairs (MGIMO-University) Publisher, 2011. (In Russian).
- Polanyi K. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Petersburg: Aletheya Publisher, 2002. (In Russian).
- Seleznev Yu.I. Fedor Dostoevsky. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya Publisher, 1981. (In Russian).
- Shakhnazarov O.L. "The Roots of Russian Socialism." Voprosy Filosofii 6 (2007): 24–37. (In Russian).
- Sizemskaya "Socialist Utopia as an Archetype of Russian Thought." Free Thought-XXI 8 (2001): 78–92. (In Russian).
- Solovyev V. Justification of Good. Moscow: Institute of Russian Civilization Publisher, Algo-rhythm Publisher, 2012. (In Russian).
- Solovyov B.S. "Three Speeches in Memory of Dostoevsky." Writings. Moscow: Mysl Publisher, 1988, volume 2. 289–323. (In Russian).
- Stepun F.A. "Desired Russia." Writings. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publisher, 2000. 515–533. (In Russian).
- Stepun F.A. "The Path of Creativity Revolution." Writings. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publisher, 2000. 425–433. (In Russian).
- Stroev A. "Russian Socialism: The Doctrine of Victory." Revolutionary Line. Ed. S.A. Stroev. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University Publisher, 2005. p. 63–73. (In Russian).
- Tombs D. Latin American Liberation Theology. Leiden: Brill, 2003.
- Voeikov M.I. Disputes about Socialism. Moscow: Slovo Publisher, 2001. (In Russian).
- Wittel A. "Digital Marx: Toward a Political Economy of Distributed Media." Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 10.2 (2012): 313–333.
- Zinoviev A. The West. Moscow: Algoritm, Eksmo Publisher, 2007. (In Russian).
- Zyuganov G. "Gennady Zyuganov: Russian Socialism Is the Response to the Russian Affair." Official Website of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. Secretariat of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, 6 Apr. 2006. Web. <https://kprf.ru/news/articles/we/40891.html>. (In Russian).
Keywords
Marxism; ideology; ‘Russian socialism’; socialism; economism; liberalism; quasi-religion; ideological consensus
Article Details
How to Cite
Nizhnikov, S. A., and A. A. Lagunov "PHIL AND SOPH: DIALOGUES ABOUT ETERNAL AND PERISHABLE. ON THE 200TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE BIRTH OF KARL MARX: MARXISM,STATE IDEOLOGY AND ‘RUSSIAN SOCIALISM’." Space and Time 1/2 (2018): 205–214.
DOI: 10.24411/2226-7271-2018-11071.
(In Russian). Fixed network address 2226-7271provr_st1_2-31_32.2018.71
Section
REFLECTION